Séminaires de recherche

To Look Like a King or Feel Like a King? Power and the Desire for Experiential vs. Material Luxury

Marketing

Intervenant : David DUBOIS
Professeur Assistant de Marketing , INSEAD

26 janvier 2017 - Salle T030 - De 10h30 à 12h00


To Look Like a King or Feel Like a King? Power and the Desire for Experiential vs. Material Luxury

By David DUBOIS

This work proposes that power shifts consumers’ desire for different types of luxury options (i.e., experiential vs. material luxury) due to a change in sensitivity to the kind of benefit consumers expect a luxury option to deliver (i.e., the experience or appearance of status). Specifically, building on findings that high power activates a propensity for agency and performance, we posit that high power increases consumers’ sensitivity to status experience. In contrast, because low power activates a propensity for communion and visibility, we posit that low power increases consumers’ sensitivity to status appearance. As a result, we hypothesize that high power triggers a desire for experiential luxury (but not material luxury), and that low power triggers a desire for material luxury (but not experiential luxury). Six studies provide converging evidence for the effect across online, lab and field settings using multiple power manipulations and measures. They also show that the effect is muted when consumption options are nonluxury, and unexplained by differences in feelings of financial deprivation, expected feelings of uniqueness, or options’ perceived riskiness or longevity. Finally, a causal chain design and a mediation provide evidence for the underlying shift in sensitivity to status experience vs. appearance.


Affective Boundaries of Scope Insensitivity

Marketing

Intervenant : Hannah H. Chang
Professeur Assistant de Marketing , Singapore Management University

25 octobre 2016 - SalleT015 - De 10h30 à 12h00


Affective Boundaries of Scope Insensitivity

Hannah H. CHANG
Singapore Management University

Abstract: When making valuation judgments, people can be surprisingly insensitive to the quantity of the objects in question—a phenomenon called scope insensitivity that is generally attributed to the operation of affective processes in judgment. Building on recent research showing that affect is inherently a decision-making system of the present, we propose that scope insensitivity is more likely to be observed in decisions that are psychologically proximate to the immediate self. Consistent with this proposition, results from seven experiments show that scope insensitivity is more likely in decisions that are temporally proximate, both prospectively (near future vs. distant future) and retrospectively (recent past vs. distant past), and in decisions that are psychologically proximate in terms of social or physical distance. These findings clarify the boundaries of the scope-insensitivity phenomenon and refine our understanding of the affective system of judgment. The findings suggest that, rather than just a decision-making system of the present, the affective system is more broadly a decision-making system of the immediate self. Any form of distance from the immediate self (in time, social relation, or physical space) tends to attenuate the engagement of the affective system.

Passing the Buck to the Wealthier

Marketing

Intervenant : Jonathan Berman
Professeur Assistant du Marketing , London Business School

5 octobre 2016 - Salle T025 - De 13h30 à 15h00


Passing the Buck to the Wealthier

How much do consumers believe that they and others should donate to charity? We find that judgments of donation obligations are referent-dependent, and are determined by people’s own earnings. This reference-dependence holds across income levels and is driven in part by overestimating the relationship between income and spare money. Individuals expect that richer others have more spare money—and thereby should donate more to charity—than what those richer others evaluate for themselves. As a result, consumers pass donation obligations onto wealthier others, who in turn pass obligations on to even wealthier others.

Playing to Learn and Learning to Play: Effects of SuperstarApp Adoption on Enhancements to Mobile App Proficiency

Marketing

Intervenant : Sungho Park
Professeur Assistant Marketing , Arizona State University

6 juin 2016 - Bâtiment T, Salle T030 - De 13h30 à 15h00


Despite the massive influx of mobile apps into the market, mobile users substantially differ with respect to their mobile app proficiency, i.e., the advent of mobile digital inequality. Using a dataset on individual mobile app usage, we examine the potential of highly ranked “superstar apps” as stimulants of consumption in terms of volume and extent, especially among less mobile-proficient users. We employ the Gaussian copula-based difference-in-differences framework given that it allows us to construct a flexible joint model of continuous app usage duration and discrete number of apps used. Results indicate that superstar adoption boosts app use variety and volume within the same app category and across different categories. Such spillover effects are more pronounced among less technically knowledgeable groups (e.g., users in their 50s or older and late adopters) and managerially under-represented target segments (e.g., irregular, occasional, and light app users). Use frequency and duration among superstar app adopters increase for newly downloaded apps but decrease for existing apps. We provide valuable implications that marketers can capitalize on to target low-proficiency users. We also recommend that policy makers can use superstar apps as nonintrusive and cost-efficient vehicles for enhancing mobile app proficiency and bridging the mobile digital inequality.

A Model for Inferring Market Preferences from Online Retail Product Information Matrices

Marketing

Intervenant : Siddarth Sivaramakrishnan
Professeur Associé , University of Southern California

1 juin 2016 - Bâtiment T, Salle T025 - De 10h30 à 12h00


This research extends information display board methods, currently employed to study information processing patterns in laboratory settings, to a field based setting that also yields managerially useful estimates of market preferences. A new model is proposed based on statistical, behavioral, and economic theories, which integrates three decisions consumers must make in this context: which product-attribute to inspect next, when to stop processing, and which, if any, product to purchase. Several theoretical options are considered on how to model product attribute selection and how to treat uninspected attributes. The modeling options are empirically tested employing datasets collected at a popular retail-manufacturer’s website, while customers were making product evaluation and purchase decisions. Subsequent to identifying the best model, we show how the resulting attribute preference estimates can be managerially employed to improve customer targeting of abandoned shopping carts, for follow up communications aimed at improving sales conversions.


JavaScriptSettings