On the Logic of Common Belief and Common Knowledge

L. Lismont, P. MONGIN

Theory and Decision

1994, vol. 37, pp.75-106

Départements : Economie et Sciences de la décision, GREGHEC (CNRS)

The paper surveys the currently available axiomatizations of common belief (CB) and common knowledge (CK) by means of modal propositional logics. (Throughout, knowledge - whether individual or common - is defined as true belief.) Section 1 introduces the formal method of axiomatization followed by epistemic logicians, especially the syntax-semantics distinction, and the notion of a soundness and completeness theorem. Section 2 explains the syntactical concepts, while briefly discussing their motivations. Two standard semantic constructions, Kripke structures and neighbourhood structures, are introduced in Sections 3 and 4, respectively. It is recalled that Aumann's partitional model of CK is a particular case of a definition in terms of Kripke structures. The paper also restates the well-known fact that Kripke structures can be regarded as particular cases of neighbourhood structures. Section 3 reviews the soundness and completeness theorems proved w.r.t. the former structures by Fagin, Halpern, Moses and Vardi, as well as related results by Lismont. Section 4 reviews the corresponding theorems derived w.r.t. the latter structures by Lismont and Mongin. A general conclusion of the paper is that the axiomatization of CB does not require as strong systems of individual belief as was originally thought - only monotonicity has thus far proved indispensable. Section 5 explains another consequence of general relevance: despite the ''infinitary'' nature of CB, the axiom systems of this paper admit of effective decision procedures, i.e., they are decidable in the logician's sense